The former Nascar and Indycar star, Danica Patrick, sparked a lively controversy within the Formula 1 community by launching a shattering accusation against FIA.

Known for her frank and direct remarks, she would have said that the governing body of the discipline “actively sabothed Red Bull and Verstappen” while “actively promoting British pilots”.

His incendiary remarks aroused indignation and fueled an intense debate on the perceived impartiality of F1.

The accusations of Patrick, apparently formulated during a podcast or a recent interview, suggest a deliberate intention of the FIA ​​to undermine the domination of Max Verstappen and Red Bull Racing. Although it has not provided explicit evidence, its words are part of a long tradition of conspiracy theories among certain fans, who think that F1 leaders systematically make decisions that benefit from certain teams or certain nationalities. This last attack in good standing on the part of an emblematic figure in motorsport considerably strengthens these feelings.

The aspect of “promoting British pilots” from Patrick’s accusations is particularly incendiary, relating to the British historical influence in Formula 1 and the success of pilots like Lewis Hamilton. Such accusations, even without concrete evidence, can sow doubt among fans and alienate part of the public who considers that his favorite teams or pilots are unjustly treated by the sports administration.

The F1 world is now struggling with the consequences of Patrick’s explosive statements. If some reject them as theories of the unfounded conspiracy, others require a response from the FIA ​​to respond to these serious allegations of partiality and manipulation. This new controversy adds additional tension to an already disputed and often controversial season, threatening to undermine the credibility of the discipline in the eyes of many passionate fans.