The fallout from the Brazilian Grand Prix wasn’t just physical wreckage; it was a psychological catastrophe that has now erupted into a full-blown internal conflict at the heart of the legendary Scuderia Ferrari. A catastrophic double retirement at Interlagos sent the team spiraling from second to fourth place in the Constructors’ standings, an unforgivable slump in the critical final races of the season. But the true danger wasn’t the loss of points; it was the chilling response from the very top.

Ferrari President John Elkann finally broke his silence, but instead of offering a message of calm, unity, or resolve, he delivered a blistering, ill-timed, and deeply personal attack on his star drivers, Charles Leclerc and Lewis Hamilton. The heir to the Agnelli dynasty didn’t mince words, effectively throwing his two world-class talents under the bus in a manner that has sent shockwaves through Maranello and across the Formula 1 world.

“We still have important races ahead of us and it is not impossible to achieve second place in the constructors,” Elkann stated, but the crucial, damaging line that followed was a warning that will echo through the team’s history: “…surely we have drivers who need to focus on driving and talk less.”

In one short, pointed sentence, the Ferrari boss praised his mechanics for “basically winning the championship” and his engineers for improving the car, but dismissed the efforts of Leclerc and Hamilton, the two figures globally credited with hauling the SF-25 chassis to performances beyond its true potential this season. The message was unmistakable: the car is good, the team is unified—the only weak link is the drivers’ focus and rhetoric.

The Ghosts of Turmoil

This staggering reprimand has instantly reignited fears of a return to Ferrari’s most turbulent periods. To veteran observers, Elkann’s statement felt like a throwback to the chaotic post-Schumacher era, a time when boardroom interference, internal political machinations, and a constant rotation of leadership repeatedly derailed the team’s momentum and cost them championships. The spokesperson’s swift, clumsy attempt at “damage control,” insisting the message was merely a “constructive” call for motivation, only served to amplify the sense of institutional panic.

The emotional core of any Formula 1 team is its unity. When the president publicly singles out and admonishes his drivers—the gladiators who risk everything on track—he doesn’t motivate; he fractures. He suggests a fundamental lack of faith precisely when unity is the only resource left to fight for P2 in the championship.

The Scathing Retort from Italian Legends

The fury this generated among the sport’s most respected voices was immediate and profound. Italian motorsport journalist Leo Turrini, one of the most authoritative voices in the paddock, delivered a scorching, no-holds-barred critique, drawing a devastating parallel to the past.

Turrini expressed utter frustration, recalling the gravitas of former chairman Luca di Montezemolo. “Would Montezemolo have ever spoken about Ferrari’s drivers the way John Elkann did today? Never. Truly, never a joy to sum it up,” he lamented. The implication is clear: a true leader of the Scuderia protects his drivers, especially in times of crisis, rather than exposing them to public blame.

Turrini went to the heart of the matter, dismantling Elkann’s narrative that the drivers are the problem. “If Ferrari hasn’t won a driver’s title since the last one and a constructor’s trophy in even longer, then clearly the problem doesn’t lie with the current drivers,” he argued forcefully. In fact, he contended that Leclerc and Hamilton have often been the sole reason the team has salvaged crucial points from what has been a deeply frustrating and winless campaign this season.

The analyst twisted the knife further, recalling Elkann’s infamous “fastest lap in Baku” comment from a few seasons ago, likening it to the president’s latest misstep—a consistent pattern of senior management misdiagnosing the core issue. His stinging conclusion provided the blueprint for change: if Elkann “truly believes that the problem at Ferrari is talkative drivers, then at the very least he needs to change his advisers, consultants, and managers.” The message is an institutional indictment: the blame lies far above the cockpit.

This sentiment was echoed by former World Champion Jenson Button, who simply remarked that John Elkann “should lead by example”—a subtle but potent suggestion that the President’s conduct does not inspire the leadership he demands.

Hamilton and Leclerc’s Unified Resistance

In the face of this unprecedented public shaming, the reaction from the drivers was one of dignified resilience and quiet defiance. They used their own platforms to communicate a message of strength and solidarity, implicitly contrasting their professionalism with the chaos emanating from the boardroom.

Lewis Hamilton, still reeling from the bruising nature of the São Paulo weekend, posted a message that resonated with his characteristic fighting spirit. It wasn’t a direct counter-attack, but a potent, powerful affirmation of his commitment: “I back my team, I back myself. I will not give up, not now, not then, not ever.” This act of personal accountability and quiet resilience served as a counter-narrative to the President’s destructive accusation. It was the multiple World Champion refusing to be defined by a crash, instead reaffirming his dedication to the badge, regardless of the political storm above him.

Charles Leclerc, whose race ended early in a first-lap clash, struck a note of fierce determination and team unity. Acknowledging the “very difficult weekend” and the disappointment of nearly no points, he was clear about the path forward: “It’s uphill from now and it’s clear that only unity can help us turn that situation around.” Leclerc, the Monégasque prodigy, was not just motivating the Scuderia; he was publicly outlining the organizational principle that his president had just violated.

Vasseur’s Delicate Balance

Amidst this maelstrom, Team Principal Fred Vasseur has been tasked with the unenviable job of managing the team’s morale while navigating the volatile politics of its ownership. Vasseur, to his credit, chose to shield his drivers, refusing to engage in the very “fingerpointing” his president had initiated.

Reflecting on the Brazilian disaster, Vasseur acknowledged the harsh reality of the situation: “It’s a tough weekend… you can’t give up points when you are giving up points, you are giving points also to the others. It’s a double penalty and in our case it’s very harsh.” Crucially, he defended Leclerc, stressing that the early collision was “not Charles’” fault. He also offered a candid assessment of Hamilton’s race, acknowledging the massive loss of downforce that crippled the car after the opening laps.

Vasseur’s pragmatic, professional response stands in stark contrast to Elkann’s impulsive outburst. He frames the problem as technical damage and points lost, not as a moral failing or a distraction from his drivers.

The Final Reckoning

With just three races left in the current winless season, the stakes could not be higher. What began as a technical challenge to secure second place in the Constructors’ Championship has now devolved into a desperate fight for the soul and unity of the Scuderia.

The historic paradox of Ferrari is that its greatest strength—its emotional passion and deep Italian heritage—is also its greatest weakness. The pressure from Maranello’s command center has often proven more toxic than any competitive deficit. The question now is whether the President’s shocking, ill-conceived attack will galvanize the team to prove him wrong, or whether it will shatter the fragile morale needed to execute a perfect closing sequence.

Lewis Hamilton, Charles Leclerc, and Fred Vasseur have all called for unity. John Elkann, through his words, has called for submission and silence. The battle lines have been drawn, not on the circuit, but in the corridors of power. And if history is any guide, an internal war is a race Ferrari simply cannot win. The next few weeks will determine not just their final standing of the season, but the psychological condition of the team heading into the upcoming new era.