Welcome to F1 News Inside the F1, where we dive into one of the most talked-about topics reverberating throughout the Formula 1 paddock: Lewis Hamilton’s unexpected struggles at the Belgian Grand Prix at Spa.

This wasn’t just a race incident—it was a revelation that has raised many eyebrows and left the entire F1 world buzzing with speculation and concern. When Hamilton made the chilling statement, “It’s the first time in my career,” it sent shockwaves far beyond the race weekend.

This wasn’t merely about a rare off weekend or a minor mistake; it pointed to something much deeper. A driver as legendary as Hamilton—someone who’s dominated the sport for two decades—experiencing a fundamental breakdown in his relationship with the car is unprecedented.

For the first time in his illustrious career, Hamilton admitted to an overwhelming disconnect, one he’d never before encountered. And this rupture, this breakdown, is far more than a struggle with car setup or tricky conditions—it hints at an issue deeply ingrained within the team and the car’s design itself.

The Events at Spa: A Shocking Revelation

The drama at Spa didn’t begin with an explosive crash or a major accident, but rather with a series of unsettling, seemingly minor incidents. On Friday, Hamilton didn’t just spin his car—his moment of losing control felt symbolic. It wasn’t just a loss of grip; it suggested a deeper, underlying issue with the car that was fundamentally misfiring for Hamilton. The weekend only worsened from there.

On Saturday, Hamilton shockingly exited Q1, which means he was knocked out of the first stage of qualifying, finishing outside the top 15. For a seven-time world champion, this was unthinkable. It wasn’t just about poor performance; it was about a breakdown of trust between Hamilton and the car, a disconnect that echoed throughout his entire performance. And then, to everyone’s astonishment, he exited Q1 again in the next session. This was a career first. A driver who had mastered the art of precision and control found himself consistently battling a car that refused to behave in the way he expected.

It wasn’t just a question of poor setup or driver error. Hamilton’s usual connection to his car—one almost psychic in its precision—was absent. The car was, as one source described it, “disobeying him entirely.” This was not a minor issue. It was a profound rupture between driver and machine, an issue that no amount of quick fixes or changes could resolve.

The Breakdown: No Clear Support from Ferrari

What made this situation even more perplexing and troubling was the lack of immediate response from Ferrari. In the face of Hamilton’s public struggles, there was no immediate support from the team. No engineers came forward to explain the issues or defend Hamilton. The usual response—an urgent debrief or some form of reassurance—was absent. Instead, the silence from Ferrari was deafening.

It wasn’t just a lack of communication; it was the apparent absence of a culture of support. In contrast, at Mercedes, Hamilton was accustomed to a culture where failure was shared, and everyone pulled together to solve problems. But at Ferrari, it felt as though the blame was being squarely placed on Hamilton’s shoulders. This lack of solidarity was felt deeply, both on the radio and in the paddock. The silence was a signal of something far deeper—a systemic issue within the team that was now being exposed.

The rumored new suspension package, which was supposed to turn things around for Hamilton, failed to deliver. According to sources, it was a game-changer for his teammate Charles Leclerc, who appeared to thrive with the new setup. But for Hamilton, it was a nightmare, and the team failed to address his struggles in real-time. Instead, they continued to focus on Leclerc’s positive feedback while Hamilton was left to carry the weight of the car’s problems alone.

The Split: Ferrari’s Political Divide

As the weekend unfolded, the contrast between Hamilton’s struggles and Leclerc’s relative success became glaringly evident. Despite using the same car and upgrades, Leclerc secured a solid P4, while Hamilton could not even get out of Q1. This disparity highlighted a key issue within Ferrari: a fundamental split within the team.

Sources close to the team have suggested that the SF25, Ferrari’s car, is politically divided. While both drivers are using the same car, they are operating in different realities—one where Leclerc’s preferences and driving style are prioritized, and another where Hamilton’s feedback and needs are not being fully addressed. This political divide within Ferrari is not just about car setup; it’s about power dynamics and who the team is truly building the car for.

Leclerc, seen as Ferrari’s long-term bet, is reportedly treated like a “native prince” within the team, with his feedback and driving style shaping the development of the car. Meanwhile, Hamilton, the outsider, is expected to adapt to a car that was not built with his needs in mind. This creates a highly challenging environment for a driver of Hamilton’s caliber, especially when he is accustomed to a more collaborative, transparent approach to car development at Mercedes.

The Trust Breakdown: Hamilton vs. Ferrari’s Culture

This dynamic goes beyond mere technicalities. Hamilton is now facing a team culture that seems to be deeply entrenched in a specific driver-first mentality. He is expected to adapt, to make a car that was designed around someone else’s preferences work for him. This is a stark contrast to the environment he thrived in at Mercedes, where every mistake was treated as an opportunity for growth, and every member of the team worked together to solve problems.

At Ferrari, however, there is a sense of isolation. Hamilton’s struggles were not met with the usual team-oriented response. Instead, there was silence—a sign of a deeper, perhaps more insidious issue within the team. This lack of support could erode Hamilton’s trust in Ferrari’s ability to help him succeed.

What’s more troubling is the suggestion that this cultural divide is systemic, affecting every level of the team. The Ferrari leadership appears to be less transparent, less willing to admit faults or failures, and more focused on deflecting blame. This creates an environment where failure is isolated, and success is seen as an individual achievement rather than a collective one.

The Future: Hamilton’s Dilemma at Ferrari

So, what does this all mean for Lewis Hamilton and Ferrari’s future? The Belgian Grand Prix was more than just a disappointing race for Hamilton—it was a wake-up call. It exposed the fragility of Ferrari’s internal dynamics and revealed how deeply ingrained political divisions are shaping the team’s performance. For Hamilton, this is a critical juncture in his career. He must decide whether he believes in Ferrari’s long-term vision and whether he can truly succeed within a system that seems to be working against him.

For Ferrari, the question is whether they can build a car and a team that can support both of their world-class drivers equally. If the internal political divide continues to widen, it will undoubtedly affect their championship aspirations. A team that is divided against itself cannot hope to compete against the likes of Mercedes and Red Bull, who seem to operate with greater unity and focus.

In the end, Hamilton’s struggles at Spa might be the beginning of a much larger, more complex battle within Ferrari. It is a battle for trust, for leadership, and for the soul of the team itself. Whether Hamilton can navigate these turbulent waters and lead Ferrari to success—or whether he will ultimately find himself forced to seek greener pastures—remains to be seen. But one thing is clear: the stakes have never been higher, and the future of Ferrari and Hamilton’s legacy is on the line.

Full Video: