The British royal family is once again under public scrutiny following renewed calls from the family of Virginia Giuffre for King Charles III to take further action against his brother, Prince Andrew. The request comes after the Duke of York voluntarily gave up several of his royal titles in recent weeks, following the posthumous publication of Giuffre’s memoir, Nobody’s Girl: A Memoir of Surviving Abuse and Fighting for Justice.

While Prince Andrew has consistently denied all allegations related to Jeffrey Epstein and Giuffre, the latest developments have reignited conversations about royal accountability and public trust.

Background: Prince Andrew’s Past Legal Challenges

Prince Andrew, the second son of Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip, has long faced questions over his association with Jeffrey Epstein, the late financier convicted of sex-related crimes. Although the prince has denied any wrongdoing, his public image suffered after his 2019 BBC Newsnight interview, where he defended his past relationship with Epstein.

In early 2022, Prince Andrew reached an out-of-court settlement in a civil case filed by Virginia Giuffre in the United States. The settlement included no admission of guilt. Following this, Queen Elizabeth II stripped him of his military affiliations and royal patronages, as confirmed by Buckingham Palace in an official statement published by the BBC

Recent Developments: Giuffre’s Memoir and Renewed Attention

The renewed attention to Prince Andrew’s case began after the release of Nobody’s Girl, Virginia Giuffre’s memoir, published posthumously earlier this month. The book recounts her experiences as a survivor of human trafficking and details her pursuit of justice.

Giuffre had been one of several individuals who spoke publicly about her experiences in connection to Epstein’s network. Her testimony played a significant role in drawing international attention to the broader issue of exploitation and abuse.

Following the memoir’s release, Prince Andrew announced his decision to relinquish the remaining royal titles he still actively used. In a formal statement shared with British media outlets including The Guardian and The Telegraph, Andrew explained that he made the decision “to ensure the continued focus on His Majesty’s work and the stability of the Royal Family.”

He reaffirmed that he “vigorously denies all allegations” but expressed his wish to prevent ongoing controversy from overshadowing the monarchy.

Calls for Further Action from Giuffre’s Family

Despite the move, Giuffre’s family believes the action does not go far enough. Speaking on ITV’s This Morning, Virginia Giuffre’s brother, Sky Roberts, urged King Charles III to consider removing Prince Andrew’s final royal title — his designation as “Prince.”

Roberts expressed that holding such a title conveys privilege and protection that should not apply if there are unresolved public concerns. “Everyone should be held to the same standard before the law,” he said, emphasizing that accountability should not depend on status or heritage.

He also encouraged authorities in the United Kingdom to review available evidence and documentation related to past investigations, stating that maintaining transparency would honor Giuffre’s legacy and support other survivors.

While his comments reflect his family’s position, no official investigation into Prince Andrew has been reopened by UK authorities at this time, according to BBC News and Reuters.

The Palace’s Position and King Charles’s Role

Buckingham Palace has not issued a new public comment on the calls from Giuffre’s family. Traditionally, the Palace refrains from discussing personal matters concerning individual members of the royal family.

King Charles III has sought to modernize the monarchy by emphasizing a “slimmed-down” royal family, focusing public duties on a smaller group of senior working royals. Prince Andrew has not held any official public role since stepping back from royal duties in 2019.

According to a report from The Times, any decision to further alter Andrew’s titles would require formal approval from both the King and, potentially, Parliament, depending on the nature of the change.

Public Reaction and Media Response

The issue has sparked widespread public debate in the United Kingdom and beyond. Some commentators argue that removing the “Prince” title would be a symbolic gesture reaffirming the monarchy’s accountability, while others believe it could set a complex precedent for royal governance.

British media outlets such as The Independent and Sky News have reported mixed reactions from the public. Supporters of the monarchy view Andrew’s current withdrawal from public life as sufficient, while critics assert that retaining his title undermines the royal family’s efforts to maintain credibility.

On social media, many users have voiced empathy for Giuffre’s family and support for their call for justice. Others have cautioned against rushing to judgment without new evidence or official legal proceedings.

Broader Implications for the Monarchy

The controversy highlights the challenges facing the royal family as it navigates issues of transparency and accountability in the modern era. King Charles III has emphasized service, integrity, and public trust as guiding principles of his reign.

Experts on royal affairs suggest that the institution’s response to sensitive matters like this one could shape its public image for years to come. Historian Dr. Anna Whitelock, speaking to CNN, noted that “how the monarchy handles internal controversies increasingly reflects its ability to adapt to a culture of accountability and openness.”

The situation also underscores the continued importance of survivor advocacy and legal reform in cases involving sexual exploitation. Advocacy organizations, including the UK’s National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (NSPCC), have reiterated calls for increased support for survivors and stronger international cooperation in addressing such crimes.

Conclusion

The renewed appeal from Virginia Giuffre’s family has reignited a complex and deeply emotional discussion surrounding Prince Andrew, accountability, and the future of the British monarchy. While the Duke of York has stepped back from public life and relinquished many of his titles, some believe further action is necessary to restore public confidence in the royal institution.

As King Charles continues to shape the next chapter of his reign, he faces the delicate task of balancing family loyalty with the public’s demand for transparency and justice.

For now, Buckingham Palace remains silent on the matter, and no formal steps have been announced. But the conversation — fueled by Giuffre’s lasting legacy and the ongoing push for accountability — continues to remind the world of the enduring importance of justice, equality, and integrity within all institutions, royal or otherwise.