Last weekend, the Belgian Grand Prix at the iconic Spa-Francorchamps circuit once again proved why it is a staple of the Formula 1 calendar — a track renowned for its unpredictable weather and dramatic racing. Yet, for the fans who eagerly woke up expecting a thrilling wet-weather spectacle, the event turned out to be a frustrating exercise in patience and cautious decisions. Rain delayed the race start by 90 minutes, the Formula 3 race was canceled, and the eventual Grand Prix lacked the intensity wet conditions typically ignite.

Despite the dampened spectacle, the race played a pivotal role in the ongoing title battle between Oscar Piastri and Lando Norris, two McLaren teammates locked in a fascinating duel this season. Piastri, the Australian rookie who has surprised many with his maturity and pace, passed Norris on the first racing lap and never looked back, securing his sixth victory of the year and extending his championship lead.

Oscar Piastri’s Rise and Record Chase

Piastri’s performance in Belgium marked his eighth career win, placing him on equal footing with Norris and Charlotte Clair in terms of career victories. Starting his F1 journey later than many of his peers, Piastri is swiftly climbing the ranks, now tying with Daniel Ricciardo for career wins. He trails only his manager, former F1 driver Mark Webber, by one victory and could soon surpass Australian legend Jack Brabham’s record for most career wins by an Australian, though matching Brabham’s three world championships remains a distant goal.

Piastri’s ability to control the race after overtaking Norris so early was reminiscent of Max Verstappen’s dominant sprint race the day before, where the Dutch driver swiftly overtook Piastri and set the pace. However, unlike the sprint race, the Grand Prix was less about battling on the track and more about strategic choices under challenging conditions.

FIA’s Wet Weather Approach Sparks Controversy

The biggest talking point of the weekend was not the racing itself, but the FIA’s cautious approach to the torrential rain that plagued the region. The delay in race start, the decision to run two safety car laps behind a slow-moving car, and the eventual drying conditions raised questions about whether the governing body had been overly cautious.

Max Verstappen was notably vocal about his frustration. The Red Bull driver explained that his team’s wet-weather setup was essentially wasted due to the FIA’s decision to wait for drying conditions. “If the FIA continues to wait for dry weather, then a wet setup is always a disadvantage,” Verstappen lamented. He described the race as “not really wet weather racing,” arguing that the event should have started at the scheduled time, despite the challenging conditions between Turns 1 and 5.

Verstappen’s concerns highlight a critical issue in modern F1 — the tradeoff between safety and spectacle. Since the introduction of the new ground-effect cars, visibility in the wet has become a serious concern. The incredible downforce generated throws vast amounts of water into the air, creating enormous spray that severely limits driver vision. This has forced the FIA to err on the side of caution, a stance made more prominent after some scary incidents in the recent British Grand Prix at Silverstone.

Fans and Media Voice Discontent

The wider F1 community echoed Verstappen’s sentiments. Media outlets such as ESPN called the delayed start a missed opportunity for a classic race, pointing to the volatile Belgian weather’s history of producing unforgettable wet races, such as the 1998 Grand Prix filled with crashes and drama. Fans had hoped for another such spectacle but were instead treated to a largely processional race on drying tarmac.

The criticism suggests the FIA’s current protocol may be robbing the sport of its most thrilling moments. While safety remains paramount, many argue that the sport has lost some of its edge by postponing races until conditions are almost perfectly dry, rather than embracing the inherent risks and excitement of racing in the rain.

Lewis Hamilton’s Redemption Run

While Verstappen struggled with his wet setup being nullified, Lewis Hamilton experienced a weekend full of ups and downs. The seven-time world champion had a particularly rough outing by his standards, failing to advance past Q1 in qualifying and finishing a lowly 15th in Saturday’s sprint race. However, Hamilton managed to claw back some respectability by finishing seventh in the main race on Sunday.

Starting from the pit lane due to an engine change allowed Hamilton and his Ferrari team to modify his car’s setup, adding much-needed downforce for the wet conditions. This gamble paid dividends early on, as Hamilton charged through the field during the initial wet stint while many competitors struggled with their low-downforce setups.

Sadly, Hamilton’s gains evaporated once the track dried and the field switched to slick tires. The Ferrari’s setup, optimized for grip in wet conditions, compromised straight-line speed and made overtaking nearly impossible despite his aggressive efforts and use of DRS (Drag Reduction System). The race ended up highlighting the ongoing technical challenge F1 faces with wet racing — balancing car setup for varying conditions and managing tire performance.

The Technical Hurdles of Wet Racing in F1

The fundamental reason F1 rarely embraces full wet racing lies in the cars’ aerodynamics. The new generation of ground-effect cars generates massive downforce, pushing water through the diffuser and ejecting it high into the air behind the car. This creates thick plumes of spray that drastically reduce visibility for trailing drivers, making wheel-to-wheel racing dangerous.

Although the FIA has tested spray guards on tires to mitigate this, the results have been insufficient to restore safe conditions for wet racing. With next season’s technical regulations aiming to reduce ground effect somewhat, it remains to be seen whether wet-weather races will become more viable. Experts predict that true wet racing — where drivers push at the limit through rain-soaked circuits — may not return for at least another four seasons.

What Does This Mean for F1’s Future?

The Belgian Grand Prix has reignited a debate about the balance between safety and entertainment in Formula 1. While it’s undeniable that modern cars and circuits are safer than ever before, the loss of rain-affected races removes one of the sport’s most electrifying elements. Fans cherish those unpredictable, adrenaline-fueled moments where driver skill, tire choice, and strategy collide in chaotic conditions.

Drivers like Verstappen and Hamilton have shown they still yearn for the challenge and glory of wet racing, even if the current format limits their opportunities. Meanwhile, the FIA faces the difficult task of evolving its regulations to accommodate both safety concerns and fans’ desire for action-packed racing.

Conclusion: A Bit of a Shame, But Hope Remains

The 2025 Belgian Grand Prix was a classic example of the double-edged sword rain brings to Formula 1. It promised drama but delivered delay and frustration. Oscar Piastri’s win solidified his status as a serious title contender, and Lewis Hamilton’s resilience showed the adaptability of F1’s best. Yet, the controversy surrounding the FIA’s cautious approach to wet weather overshadowed much of the on-track action.

For fans and drivers alike, the hope is that future technical changes will restore the thrill of wet racing to the pinnacle of motorsport. Until then, the Belgian Grand Prix serves as a reminder of what once was — and what could be again — when rain, risk, and racing combine to create unforgettable moments.

Full Video: